Jan Wielemaker

> * Yes, as extra step, instead of `#warning` you can add `#error "Depracted. Use SWI-cpp2.h instead"` That is a it too drastic IMO. I don't want to break working...

I just deleted the version 1 docs and uncommented the `#warning` for the deprecation. Probably some more work needs to be done to the docs to make the status completely...

> I also found this nice repo https://github.com/ethz-asl/ros-prolog I guess this is more a discussion for the Discourse forum. There are definitely more ways to talk to Prolog from C++....

Thanks. The SWI-Prolog issue list is more for bugs. Discussion is primarily on https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/ I see some potential. One could also consider implementing a blob type that supports protocols?

> A singular blob type has to share the same handlers for acquire & release This blob can proxy to the user blob. That is, if I recall correctly, also...

Thanks for the suggestion. Seems minor to me. The build procedure is pretty much standard: `cmake`, working with Unix make, ninja or Microsoft nmake (and probably more; not tested) backends....

I see. Not much time to work on this shortly. The problem is that somehow it decides on the 2nd argument for indexing. It seems a rather peculiar case that...

> `Up to version 9.3.18, the primary index was fixed to the first argument.` This is not the problem. The problem is that it prefers a dubious hash over a...

Thanks. Without.a detailed instruction to reproduce this is of little value. In particular as the stack trace is mostly bogus, probably due to lacking symbols (release version on MacOS?)

I missed there was the source. Sorry. It doesn't reproduce (tried 5 times), which is not so strange as we are on 9.3.28 these days. You could try the PPA...