Porphyry
Porphyry copied to clipboard
Hypertopic
Support or criticize the use of a category in an item's description
Phase 1
- [ ] Scenarios (Gherkin)
- [ ] Mockups
- [ ] Implementation strategy
Phase 2
- [ ] Acceptance tests (Capybara)
- [ ] Implementation
Phase 3
- [ ] Screencast
Everybody can add or modify categories associated to an item. However, these categories might be not relevant. In order to ensure that these categories are relevant, each user can validate or discredit a category, by leaving a "thumbs up" or a "thumbs down" to it.
@neumeiej This a good general description of the feature. Thx for this. Now, could you be more specific on how it could benefit your own project?
In the vases project : usefull to engage the discussion arround the relevance of a given category. Considering that archeology and the work arround historic objects is not a precise science, a criticism might help things to move further.
@KillerKrok 😱 Please phrase it (and mean it) differently when you meet your main stakeholder... Being complex and debated doesn't mean it is not precise...
It is not what i meant. For example, as you mentioned it during a lesson, you cannot always give a precise date (month/year) to an object. In the same vein, many uses can be attributed to one object. So in our project, this feature would offer the possibility to discuss these topics.
Projet Cité du vitrail Cette fonctionnalité permettra de donner son avis sur la catégorie d'un vitrail dans sa description.
@aamina12 N'oubliez pas d'ajouter ce ticket au kanban de votre équipe.
Oui c'est ajouté.
@aamina12 N'oubliez pas d'ajouter ce ticket au kanban de votre équipe. Oui c'est ajouté.
Je ne vois pas @Hypertopic/cite-du-vitrail dans la liste des projets (colonne de droite de cette page). Dans votre kanban, vous devez ajouter les tickets par référence et non pas créer une note.