SAF-Specification

SAF-Specification copied to clipboard

We have now a terms definition viewpoint generated from the model.

A development view on the VP is now available

The VP is based on michaels proposal.

The status is still proposed because some key information is missing:

Purpose: needs a nicely written text

Applicability: needs reference to SEHB5

Presentation needs discussion if there should be two tables (terms and abbreviations) or if one is enough

Concerns need review

• What are the sources (e.g. a standard) of terms?
• Which terms and abbreviations are applicable to the system of interest or its system elements and their interfaces and interactions

Stakeholders in michaels proposal there were more stakeholders but i wont add them if noone provides a rationale

Implementation we need to check how tools handle glossary references and chose a proper implementation. this might require tool specific quirks

Please contribute to this viewpoint, @GfSE/saf !