tinyGS
tinyGS copied to clipboard
Update VR3X-A/B/C NORAD numbers
Packets have 0 in the norad field for VR3X-A (and maybe B & C?). Hence this search for valid numbers ...
$ curl -sSLR 'http://www.planet4589.org/space/log/satcat.txt' | egrep 'V-R3X'
S047463 2021-006BC Cora ? V-R3X 1 NASA/CMU 2021 Jan 24 In Earth orbit 2021 Jan 27 LLEO/S 95.25 527 x 535 x 97.51
S047467 2021-006BG Petrie ? V-R3X 2 NASA/CMU 2021 Jan 24 In Earth orbit 2021 Jan 26 LLEO/S 95.26 528 x 535 x 97.52
S047524 2021-006DQ Littlefoot ? V-R3X 3 NASA/CMU 2021 Jan 24 In Earth orbit 2021 Jan 27 LLEO/S 95.26 528 x 535 x 97.52
$
So they are 47463, 47467, and 47524. However, I'm wondering if the 1, 2, and 3 are A, B, and C or C, B, and A. (see https://tinygs.com/satellites).
Sadly (once again) Celestrack does not have the names of the satellites added. ...
$ curl -sSLR 'https://www.celestrak.com/pub/satcat.txt ' | egrep '47463|47467|47524'
2021-006BC 47463 OBJECT BC TBD 2021-01-24 AFETR 95.3 97.5 538 524 N/A
2021-006BG 47467 OBJECT BG TBD 2021-01-24 AFETR 95.3 97.5 538 524 N/A
2021-006DQ 47524 OBJECT DQ TBD 2021-01-24 AFETR 95.3 97.5 537 524 N/A
$
BTW: Why VR3X-A on TinyGS vs V-R3X-A? Inquiring minds want to know.
(Update)
I see that the norad number is correctly listed on https://tinygs.com/satellite/VR3X-A (and -B, -C) pages; however, that isn't reflected in the packet data. But that does not fully confirm the correct order of A, B, and C.
Thanks Martin,
We have fixed the NORAD numbers on the autotune function and updated all the old packets on the database.
Here you have the decoder from Max Holliday: https://github.com/maholli/VR3X-decoder/blob/main/gs_parse_standalone.py
VR3X-A Littlefoot start with --> 33 3A VR3X-B Petrie start with --> 33 3B VR3X-C Cera start with --> 33 3C
The information coming from planet4589 doesn't look accurate, in any case as all the sat share the same radio configuration, the decoder use the second byte to properly identify each satellite.
Please note that VR3X-A entries in the packets API still returns 0 (vs. 47463). It once did return values correctly. Sadly, that regressed backwards.