QualityScaler icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
QualityScaler copied to clipboard

x1 upscale of nicely printed form isn't looking that fancy

Open rmast opened this issue 3 years ago • 3 comments

Source: 175789293-f39ddfdb-6f3e-4598-8d16-80a1f4a88b36

Result: 175789293-f39ddfdb-6f3e-4598-8d16-80a1f4a88b36_BSRGAN_x1

rmast avatar Jul 03 '22 09:07 rmast

x1 and x0.5 are usefull for really big images. But at least we know that the app works, you can try now x2 it will be much better

Djdefrag avatar Jul 03 '22 10:07 Djdefrag

If x1 is that bad compared with x2 it shouldn't be offered. I didn't get CUDA do it's job. I didn't try my last hint on that subject. That quality loss at x1 is not motivating further testing.

Outlook voor Android downloadenhttps://aka.ms/ghei36


From: Annunziata Gianluca @.> Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2022 12:04:51 PM To: Djdefrag/QualityScaler @.> Cc: rmast @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [Djdefrag/QualityScaler] x1 upscale of nicely printed form isn't looking that fancy (Issue #11)

x1 and x0.5 are usefull for really big images. But at least we know that the app works, you can try now x2 it will be much better

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Djdefrag/QualityScaler/issues/11#issuecomment-1173051222, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZPZ5X4ETYMZ4Y3S2PDNKLVSFQUHANCNFSM52QNZIJA. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

rmast avatar Jul 03 '22 12:07 rmast

It can be used for very big images for example 10000 x 10000

Djdefrag avatar Jul 03 '22 13:07 Djdefrag