Álvaro

Results 29 comments of Álvaro

I will comment that if it would be interesting. I had problems with an assembly that is .net standard, because it wasn't covered by the tests. This is because in...

@grokky1 I am sad to hear that in your case this solution doesn't work. Anyway, if you don't need the features that .net Core has and .net standard doesn't have,...

@grokky1 I have tried this in a .net standard project, I don't know if the trick will work or not in .net Core, it seems that it doesn't work because...

I will comment that if it would be interesting. I had problems with an assembly that is .net standard, because it wasn't covered by the tests. This is because in...

I have tried to use this code: ``` var miConfig = TypeAdapterConfig .NewConfig() .PreserveReference(true); ClaseTest4 miClaseTest4 = new ClaseTest4(); ClaseTest4DTO miClase4DTO = miClaseTest4.Adapt(); ``` But I have estill the same...

I have tried too: ``` var miConfig = TypeAdapterConfig .NewConfig() .PreserveReference(true); ClaseTest4 miClaseTest4 = new ClaseTest4(); ClaseTest4DTO miClase4DTO = miClaseTest4.Adapt(miConfig); ``` But I get an error that tells that can't...

I include a solution with an example, that include the code and a .bak with a Sql Server database. But I whill explain the two cases. I have orders and...

With AsNoTrackingWithIdentities, I don't have problems, for me it works as I expected. It is with AsNoTracking. To try to use the same concepts, I will explain what I understand...

With as NoTracking() EF decide to include in the collection of the order of the category the order, why is it included this order when I didn't tell with ThenInclude()?

Yes, it is the same than the other user request, decide if to fix up or not the relationship. As you comment the other issue, this is the bahavior that...