Benoît Cortier

@matoous Cool! I think you should open a PR with that so we can discuss in more details 🙂 @the-mikedavis also said something about that by the way: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/2740#issuecomment-1152513797

I'll pin this issue because it seems to me it could use more visibility. We currently pin two issues out of the maximum of three, so I went ahead.

This is looking pretty good! Agreed with @sudormrfbin. > * Last but not least, could someone asses or help me asses what the performance implications of the implementation are? Unless...

> Either way, I would keep the config simple `bool` for now For reference: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/3944#discussion_r977971333 My problem with this is that it will then be a breaking change to modify...

#4381 sounds exactly like this 🙂

I don't really use the splitting feature because i3 does the job for me, but I think it can be useful to some people. However, I really like the client/server...

So consensus so far appears to be in favor of keeping the built-in splits. However, I'm strongly in favor of the ability to share buffers across windows.

> > two user clients > > I wish the two clients can have different configurations but that is even harder. Actually it would probably be the default behavior. We...

> I assume you could have multiple different server sessions going at once, though, right...? I often find myself with multiple logically distinct editor sessions open (e.g. one working on...

Very cool! Would also address #4335 beautifully :100: