Benjamin Engeset

@StefanIvemo I did not come across your comment before now, but this would be preferred. Using inbuilt logic from the binary would be to considerate as the most optimal. I...

@jtracey93 1. It is first of all targeting this repository. Reason why is simply because organizations tend to fork/download this repo and as is/use with minor tweaking. Creating anything enterprise...

Awzm stuff, thanks for taking the time and responding so quickly!

Superb! Great news.

> @bengeset96 just an update on this. You may of seen the PSRule PR got merged last week and we will start adding more tests for each module in the...

@BernieWhite Are you already working with this one? If not, I'd like to give it a try. This is great news.

@BernieWhite Ready for PR. Notes from my side - The rule will only run when geo-replication and retention policy are not configured. This is preview limitation. This has both advantages...

> @bengeset96 Great work! Just a few minor tweaks otherwise all good. @BernieWhite Done. I think we are ready.

@Dylan-Prins You can use the `AzurePowerShell@5` task. I am using private ACRs for Bicep repositories (modules) and using this configuration currently. ``` - task: AzurePowerShell@5 displayName: "Validate module files with...

@BernieWhite So it will be that when `properties.availabilitySet` has an valid value, then we should check for that `properties.networkProfile.networkInterfaceConfigurations.properties.ipConfigurations.properties.applicationGatewayBackendAddressPools` or `properties.networkProfile.networkInterfaceConfigurations.properties.ipConfigurations.properties.loadBalancerBackendAddressPools` has an valid value? After checking some quickstart templates...