Andrea Terzolo

@Molter73 we don't want to break again your tests with other changes in the `sinsp-example` :( Are these changes ok for you or do we need to change something? or...

I cannot approve it, because i worked on it, but it seems ready IMHO

Hi all 🖖 I wrote down some ideas about a new BPF probe. If you are interested, you can take a look [here](https://github.com/falcosecurity/libs/pull/268) :eyes:

You are right @2Bor2C, we will try to insert it in `0.33`

/remove-lifecycle stale

Hey, @hbrueckner thank you for reporting this! I know there are these kinds of problems in architectures like `s390x` this is why right now we are not officially supporting them...

Uhm I have seen [here](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/6ae08ae3dea2cfa03dd3665a3c8475c2d429ef47) that the `bpf_probe_read_user` and `bpf_probe_read_kernel` helpers are defined only in kernels >= `5.5`, so, unfortunately, we cannot fix all the previous kernel versions :/

> Perhaps, SCHEMA_VERSION? Good question, to be honest the `schema` should exactly the same, the params sent are the same, only the content change :thinking: BTW we have already bumped...

/remove-lifecycle stale

This is what I propose, let's see if it sounds good to you :) The Falco UX will provide an array of bytes dimensions, let's see a realistic example: Numbers...