Amit Kumar Das
Amit Kumar Das
@sathieu This issue as well as https://github.com/metacontroller/metacontroller/issues/4 are pointing to same stuff. I was thinking to put these as two separate repos since library mode will be typical Golang based...
similar work has been done https://github.com/AmitKumarDas/metac/tree/master/config All the references to above config should help to understand the challenges, usefulness, etc.
@grzesuav `metac` & `metacontroller` are compatible. There is no change to existing features. Metac has added one new feature i.e. `GenericController` & new test cases (_unit as well as integration...
If we decide not to merge `Metac` to `Metacontroller` as a single PR then we need to send each of the following item as a separate PR: - **1/** Build...
> @AmitKumarDas how difficult would be to apply work done in [AmitKumarDas/metac#136](https://github.com/AmitKumarDas/metac/issues/136) against current version of metacontroller ? It should not be difficult. We need to follow the steps mentioned...
There are no bug fixes but improvements for sure. Copying the improvements from metac to here will be a good one.
I would be glad to contribute and maintain MetaController in whatever form the community decides. Is there anyone who can start a new home/repo etc? Do we need any approvals...
It will be really good to have this embedded into controller-runtime and get more community support. Let me know if there are any proposals with this investigation & I will...
Just wondering, if all of us agree to continue with the original purpose of MetaController. In other words, it provides us with couple of controller implementations (_abstracts the developers from...