David Oberhollenzer
David Oberhollenzer
Hi @Error1000 , > So recently i created a squash fs archive of a ~250gb uncompressed tar with: `sqfs2tar -b 1M -X extreme`, the resulting squashfs archive (~213GB in size)...
Hi! Regarding the ownership & permission bits issue: `mksquashfs` packs files from a directory and can use a "pseudo file" listing to modify ownership and permissions of some entries. The...
Oh, one more thing: could you run `sqfsdiff -SCOP` on the images? This way we can check if the difference in size is *actually* caused by the data packing and...
In the current master branch, gensquashfs now has 3 new options: ``` --set-uid, -u --set-gid, -g --all-root ``` Those can be used to force UID/GID for *all* inodes to a...
The size difference was due to the missing block size argument for `gensquashfs`. Using the same images and unpacking/repacking them with the correct block size, the result is similar to...
Those options are not in upstream mksquashfs, but I managed to find them in the squashfskit fork. I tried patching squahfs-tools-ng to expose those and ran a few tests: ```shell...
Hi @aparcar , I just browser through the change set and it appears the problem is that there are no files in the resulting SquashFS because the listing file doesn't...
Hi @birunts , in the `master` branch, I have started to move as much as possible of the re-usable utility code into `libsquashfs`, with the goal to have a high-level...
> Just a question, any reason why the library version does not conform the tag version? `libsquashfs.so.1.4.1` -> `tag 1.3.1` Because this is a library ABI version, not to be...
Hi, both directory indices and hard link detection were so far considered nice-to-have features and other things took precedence so far. The basic infrastructure for directory indices was already there...