don't play well with openzepplin

Thanks for this great library! but updating openzeppelin-solidity to latest 4.0.0 and I can not compile my project

running but outdated combination taken from https://github.com/ProjectOpenSea/opensea-erc1155

    "multi-token-standard": "github:ProjectOpenSea/multi-token-standard",
    "openzeppelin-solidity": "^2.1.3",

How to reproduce, upgrading 3rd parties

openzeppelin-solidity 4.0.0    // use pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
@0xsequence/erc-1155 3.0.4    // use use pragma solidity ^0.7.4;

Tried both

    solc: {
      version: "^0.8.0",
    },

,ParserError: Source file requires different compiler version (current compiler is 0.8.3+commit.8d00100c.Emscripten.clang) - note that nightly builds are considered to be strictly less than
the released version
 --> @0xsequence/erc-1155/contracts/tokens/ERC1155/ERC1155MintBurn.sol:2:1:
  |
2 | pragma solidity 0.7.4;

or

    solc: {
      version: "^0.7.4",
    },

,ParserError: Source file requires different compiler version (current compiler is 0.8.3+commit.8d00100c.Emscripten.clang) - note that nightly builds are considered to be strictly less than
the released version
 --> @0xsequence/erc-1155/contracts/tokens/ERC1155/ERC1155MintBurn.sol:2:1:
  |
2 | pragma solidity 0.7.4;

what do you recommend? rollbacking openzeppelin-solidity to a previous version? hoping that I find one which stilluse Solc 0.7 branch?

@cedricwalter thanks for the report -- I've noticed you closed this ticket -- did you find a solution? any updates on your experience?

thanks

Yes and no, I switched to a pure Open Zeppelin ERC1155 implementation. I closed this report since it is not really an error, mixing 2 library (yours and open zeppelin), and adding truffle is something you may not want to urgently fix.

Cool thanks. I'll reopen for us to look into some time in the future

I actually prefer this implementation but want to use some other contracts from Open Zeppelin. I run into this same issue. Are you planning to upgrade to 0.8.*?

@aalmada yes we will – it will be an easy upgrade too.

curious which parts you prefer in this implementation?