Christoph Hormann

> We have to interpret unknown values regardless. If we have access=baz and it's unknown we still have to render the road one of the three ways. Currently, if a...

> A catch-all is when we're rendering all features regardless of what they are. That's what we've tried to reduce. #4568 and #4725 are cases of catch-alls in secondary tags...

I would strongly suggest first to develop consensus on the desired tag interpretation and then think about implementation details. Choosing a certain tag interpretation because it is more convenient to...

> This is not what I suggested. I made no suggestion as to what a way with unknown access for the primary method is. Ok, i removed the attribution to...

@pnorman - reacting with a :-1: to my comment but not explaining what you disagree with is decidedly non-helpful. If there is anything unclear about the list of options i...

From a quick look this seems like a structure that can be adjusted to any of the options in tag interpretation discussed so far so works well in terms of...

> I'm not convinced that a primary foot mode works here. They are basically vehicle roads with signage to restrict vehicles in much the same way as ordinary roads. I...

I think this is going too far outside the topic of this PR and #214. As indicated at the moment we are not rendering access restrictions on `highway=pedestrian`. We are...

Well - independent of if you universally get an error for that, the `END` after the `SELECT` does not make sense.

> We disagree on if there is no feedback or not. Having re-read what you said, I still conclude that we're offering some feedback no matter how we do this....