Christoph Hormann

> The negative arguments do not apply to objects located on land. That is not true, on the contrary: The presence of a `waterway=tidal_channel` land-side of the coastline is clear...

Thanks for the suggestion. Tag has 360 uses so far, almost exclusively on linear ways, use it mostly limited to a few localized concentrations by individual mappers. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dfloating_barrier https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=floating_barrier

I am reopening this because use has widened since 2022, not so much in bare numbers (these are still low) but in geographic scope and in number of mappers actively...

It is doubtful that a symbol can be developed that meaningfully represents what `landuse=recreation_ground` is practically used for. For a previous discussion of the semantic problems of the tag see...

Thanks for the suggestion. But once again: please specify the tagging you would like to see rendered so we don't have to spend time searching what you might be referring...

Yes, the current design of indicating access restricted POIs of various types with a lighter color symbol is a conveniently simple but not very intuitive approach to rendering. > *...

We need an overall concept for the tag interpretation here that reliably ensures a consistent rendering. There are some cornerstones that provide fundamental constraints on that: 1. plain `highway=path` should...

> In practice, the JOSM presets for shared and segregated cycleways are highway=path, bicycle=designated and foot=designated with segregated=no|yes. So I don't think we have much option except to promote path...

> Ultimately the combination of bicycle=designated and foot=designated is ambiguous I don't think it is. It is a borderline case in our three class system for display. But outside of...

> If bike and foot is both equally allowed, we could render "the faster one" (so bicycle) like the motorcar in the residential road. Yes, that would be a possible...