Christoph Hormann
Christoph Hormann
> If you had a "proper" shelter next to a bus stop, then you would want to consistently prioritise the "proper" shelter. I see no reason not to prioritize bus...
> So you could just do something like: > > > ``` > > CASE > > WHEN feature = 'amenity_shelter_public_transport' THEN 17 > > ELSE 16 > > END...
> It would mean that bus stops would oddly block any POIs with higher starting zoom (including "normal" shelters!), but there probably aren't many of those? As already mentioned they...
What you can do is aggregating different feature types into a common priority (despite them having different starting zoom levels) and this way you don't need to develop a full...
Since i am not familiar with the sport in question: We render golf course in the differentiated way we do because they are: * fairly wide spread world wide (both...
> Answering point by point: Trying to follow your analysis - i can see the exact opposite on most points: * the tags seem to be used almost exclusively in...
For balance also some samples from the US: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13828972 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225827585 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885616922 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200456347 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278098436 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870835645 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3192369977 I could only find very few cases in OSM in either the US or Europe...
`locked=*` has 39k uses on `barrier=gate`, `access=*` 920k. So the latter is more frequently mapped and also more significant for the map user. Hence i would not be in favor...
As said - what mappers predominantly map and what we would like to show - if feasible design wise - is access restrictions on gates. I don't think anything more...
I don't think the idea of rendering barrier symbols in a weaker form for locked or access restricted barriers is in any way intuitive. If at all a locked/access restricted...