Andrey Loskutov

There is a proposal to increase memory once again, like in https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/pull/850/files but I honestly doubt that this will work.

Unfortunately yes. I've used to retrrigger failed Linux builds every second day.

@merks : if you have time, maybe you could do that? It is not urgent, just nice to have.

I assume infra team fixed something. The fails stopped immediately after I've reported this ticket (and were failing almost every day before). So it seems it is enough to open...

Still recurring problem, today it failed three times!  https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/job/Releng/job/ep-collectResults/1562/console ``` 07:18:32 !SESSION 2023-06-20 01:18:05.201 ----------------------------------------------- 07:18:32 eclipse.buildId=4.28.0.I20230605-0440 07:18:32 java.version=17.0.2 07:18:32 java.vendor=Oracle Corporation 07:18:32 BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86_64, WS=gtk, NL=en...

> Is this one still an issue? I don't recall anything lately. https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/job/Releng/job/ep-collectResults/2774/

This change caused severe regression in the compare editor, see https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/issues/1489.

I believe it would be OK for SWT test/example projects except SWT main code itself, which is very "special" and where re-formatting would cause only troubles.

No, the git blame will be unusable, and that is the main issue, a blocker. Beside this, yes, no one will be able to review tons of reformatted production code,...

> @iloveeclipse have I addressed your comments? Yes, thanks. Where are the new `org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs` formatter settings coming from? I haven't reviewed every file, I assume they are all copy/pasted from...