Andrey Loskutov

I believe proposed [PR](https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/pull/473) doesn't cover the use case we have completely, as it only works on open/close of projects. So it can't detect changes made while Eclipse was closed...

Note: as a workaround you can set in preferences to show structure compare in the Outline view. In this case it will work with the correct (active) editor. Beside this,...

My concern is and was **any** additional IO for metadata, independently if on start or on stop. We saw in the past that workspaces with the metadata located on NFS...

We saw marker files of 20 MB and bigger, up to 200 - 300 MB. It could be it is compressed better in latest SDK, the problem we've investigated was...

In our case the problem is not the heap, but NFS. We run with defaults starting with 12 GB and max 31 GB, depending on workstation RAM installed (64 -...

The problem with SDK is that you don't know how it is used. It can be an "embedded" Linux with 2GB RAM and any extra ~5MB might be too much,...

reopening because #283 caused regression in #464 and will be reverted.

I don't know what kind of use case was behind originally implemented code, may be there is a test that would fail, let see: https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/pull/1209 Current code comment doesn't make...

There are at least some tests failing, the question is if they are really wanted use that feature or "worked by occasion" because of the current implementation: [Test Result](https://ci.eclipse.org/platform/job/eclipse.platform/job/PR-1209/1/testReport/) (11...

> please explain why you think it is vaild there but not here. One should not compare apples with oranges. Here we are talking about code contract that is as...