Ilario Gelmetti

Sounds good. What if we tag a release candidate, make a call for testing also on 19.07 (until now the testing was very limited on this front) and set the...

> I've cherry-picked bug fixes and some other commits from master, but not all, and tagged 20.09-rc.2. Some enhancements from master that are not very well tested are not included....

> We can drop libremesh.mk entirely. It was intended to simplify and unify things, however if it's preferred to keep things heterogeneous, sure. Don't get me wrong: I think libremesh.mk...

If the packages keep their "LiMe" category, the "LibreMesh" category will still be present and will contain just the network profiles: https://github.com/libremesh/network-profiles/blob/42e4539f08dcf7b0fb49b1753e5bed739429e28a/profile.mk#L35 as they are suggested to include in the...

The new release 2020.1 has been officially announced! Now we should "just" update the website, choose a SDK (I propose to fork this one: https://github.com/aparcar/openwrt-metabuilder) and publish some basic binaries...

The website should be updated now. We don't have a SDK. The firmware for the ath79 target are published on https://downloads.libremesh.org/expansive_emancipation/2020.1/targets/ath79/generic/ I think this is enough for considering this issue...

In lime-proto-batadv: https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/blob/9a671f8e1e269f7c606ea2a6ad857dc54b6e4010/packages/lime-proto-batadv/files/usr/lib/lua/lime/proto/batadv.lua#L26-L31

https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/blob/master/packages/ubus-lime-location/files/usr/bin/migrate-libremap-cfg https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/pull/805#discussion_r523397113

I looked into it and it happens because a line with the options gets added here: https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/blob/1aacfea7b3ad97fb8c549a66fa7e7526a6419bd2/babeld/files/babeld.init#L129 and a line without options gets subsequently added here: https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/blob/1aacfea7b3ad97fb8c549a66fa7e7526a6419bd2/babeld/files/babeld.init#L142 @jech does this...

@jonglezb any insight? Thanks!