Ilario Gelmetti

Some tests are failing, maybe is too early for requiring at least sklearn 1.4.0?

> Do you know what version change was implemented in? I am not sure I understand the question. Can confirm that the info in my original comment does not already...

> I think this needs to also be changed: > > https://github.com/sustainable-processes/summit/blob/1de682d05e97adcfb96cd8376e876cef2d6160d3/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L43 Done. Now I observed a failure as this line https://github.com/sustainable-processes/summit/blob/34162c8157d56ee860631ac7b713edfbe9c21e3a/summit/benchmarks/experimental_emulator.py#L369 does not provide to `sklearn/model_selection/_validation._score` a `score_params` parameter...

Now it fails as we are providing a dict for scorer but scorer cannot be a dict anymore since this edit: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/commit/cf1fb224770051734241d02830545a08db3fcdc4#diff-24fbe29b336ea0ad7ef67d54c362bfebd086d2367337526fb99dae4583891c2dL972-L974 They moved the dict conversion code to these...

There is still one error that gets raised at these lines: https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/2b9ca0734ead966146321fa22d009d5eb186eb0b/pandas/core/indexes/multi.py#L3525-L3527 And it happens when running the example from [`LogSpaceObjectives` documentation]( https://github.com/sustainable-processes/summit/blob/1de682d05e97adcfb96cd8376e876cef2d6160d3/summit/strategies/base.py#L501). ``` >>> from summit.domain import * >>>...

Thank you indeed for the very useful and open source tool :D

In the previous step, the `test_runner_mo_integration[experiment1-NelderMead]` test failed (did not understand why). https://github.com/sustainable-processes/summit/actions/runs/11478033686/job/31941404822?pr=271#step:6:34 But now the tests are failing for a weird new reason: ``` Run actions/setup-python@v2 with: python-version: 3.9...

In the workflow run there are some warnings that maybe are useful for identifying the error: the warnings complain about the fact that we are using old versions of actions/checkout,...

More info on this project: https://projects.freifunk.net/#/projects?project=simplify_libremesh_and_get_it_closer_to_openwrt https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2025/projects/NivhKPOA https://blog.freifunk.net/2025/06/02/simplifying-libremesh-with-openwrt-native-solutions/ In short the idea is to get as close as possible to OpenWrt. Ideally, LibreMesh should be possible to install on top...

I think you should use something like shared-state, yes. What needs to be found out is how to tell odhcpd that there a new lease has been issued by another...