Fernando José

Thank you very much for the comments. > I think they're right to be surprised that `T a; T b{a};` does not make a copy of `a`. > I hadn't...

The last item of the list is `???`, which I assume is a placeholder denoting that the list is not set in stone.

Oh, are they? I could not manage to reproduce. I have checked the links in P.8 and they all work fine.

Hey I encountered the original issue too (Chromium on Arch) After a quick check, I believe the cause is a bit different ``` curl -I https://camo.githubusercontent.com/29765c4a32f03bd01d44edef1cd674225e3c906b/68747470733a2f2f63646e2e7261776769742e636f6d2f66616365626f6f6b2f6372656174652d72656163742d6170702f323762343261632f73637265656e636 173742e737667 HTTP/2 403 cache-control:...

I suggest keeping it as it is, avoiding to rewrite 'passing the data as an object by reference to const' 'passing the data as a const reference to an object'.

Although the wording in the logic might be convoluted, the two sentences agree on an exception type, or a type to throw, having a noexcept copy constructor.

> Note that a third enforcement could be added in this context: > > * Flag switch-statements where the cases cover all enumerators and there is a default. > >...

> Agreed, although this is considered bad practice in most cases. > > Note that my request is not about this extra enforcement but making sure the rule synopsis and...

I think it might be caused if you don't have Mosek installed in your machine so it does not get to execute.

> Hi! just wanted to know that if backward-pass needs both the reduceOps replaced or removed for perf? I'd guess it is about simplifying the two reduces into one.