datatracker
datatracker copied to clipboard
RFC 7042 is no longer part of BCP 141
Describe the issue
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 08:56:00 -0700 CC: "Donald Eastlake" [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Why is RFC 7042 part of BCP 141? To: "IETF Support" [email protected] From: "Sandy Ginoza" [email protected]
Hi all,
Donald is correct that RFC 9542 should be the only RFC associated with BCP 141. RFC 7042 is no longer part of BCP 141, as it is obsolete. In looking at the Datatracker, these pages likely need to be updated: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp141/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7042/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9542/
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thanks, Sandy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>
Subject: Why is RFC 7042 part of BCP 141?
Date: May 26, 2024 at 2:46:05 PM PDT
To: RFC Editor <[email protected]>
Hi,
Note that RFC 7042 is obsolete by RFC 9542. So why isn't BCP 141 just RFC 9542?
Thanks,
Donald (an author of both RFC 7042 and RFC 9542)
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
[email protected]
Code of Conduct
- [X] I agree to follow the IETF's Code of Conduct
See also #7244
This problem still seems to exist 😟
Fixed in 12.34.0
Fixed in 12.34.0
Typo- should be 12.43.0
Thanks for fixing this.
Donald
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA @.***
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 7:16 PM Robert Sparks @.***> wrote:
Closed #7479 https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/7479 as completed.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/7479#event-18365738247, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADKM6BTADBINKQVTOLZBLKD3FXGGVAVCNFSM6AAAAACAKEILX6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJYGM3DKNZTHAZDINY . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>