Asking for a recently-added RFC from a URI gets a weird error

[paulehoffman]

Describe the issue

Right now, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9539 generates the response shown in the attachment.

Code of Conduct

• [X] I agree to follow the IETF's Code of Conduct

[paulehoffman]

I captured that because, as expected, once the Datatracker got the new RFC from the RFC Editor, that URL works as expected.

[jennifer-richards]

Thanks - I can reproduce with any non-published RFC number. I think it's falling back to a search for a type that the search view hasn't been taught to understand. The inappropriate error display is a fun bonus.

[paulehoffman]

Loving your idea of a "fun bonus". :-)