htmlized version of RFC has bad errata link

[paulehoffman]

trafficstars

Describe the issue

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6761 says that "Errata exist". But, when going to the errata paged linked there, https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6761&rec_status=0 , the RFC Editor's page says there are no errata. One has to remove the "&rec_status=0" to see that there is in fact an erratum, but it is held for update.

Suggestion: remove the "&rec_status=0".

Code of Conduct

• [X] I agree to follow the IETF's Code of Conduct