Conflict Review request form should make it clear that the ise is already going to be copied

[rjsparks]

The Conflict Review request form has a field that populates the documents "Send Notices To".

The secretariat is currently dealing with a transition of the ISE, but the Send Notices To has explicitly named Adrian, and the secretariat is having to manually remove the name from things like approval announcements.

The form should both let the user know that the ise will get copied already showing them the [email protected] address, and clean it out of the Send Notices To field if it is added.

cc: @akvezza, @cindymorgan

[meadmaker]

This writeup explicitly names [email protected], but the only place I see that handled specially also treats [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected] the same way. I'll make this generic to all of them unless you object.

[rjsparks]

Sure - we just haven't had problems with that in the past to drive the request.

[meadmaker]

Can you tell us who Adrian is, and how Adrian relates to [email protected]? @jennifer-richards and I are going back and forth as to whether excluding the stream editor email address ([email protected]) explicitly is the right approach, or whether excluding the group chair for the RFC stream for the document is the right approach.

[cindymorgan]

Can you tell us who Adrian is, and how Adrian relates to [email protected]?

Adrian was the previous ISE, before Eliot Lear. The [email protected] email address moved from Adrian to Eliot when the ISE role was handed over.