spojbackup icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
spojbackup copied to clipboard

Bug fixed

Open rkpoddar opened this issue 12 years ago • 3 comments

I have made a few appropriate changes in the code. It is no longer creating empty 0 byte files.

rkpoddar avatar Jan 28 '13 20:01 rkpoddar

I understand that changes to spoj urls & in the ways they serve results might've been the root cause. If so, it would've also failed at authentication stage. Anyway,

I wouldn't be merging this straight off because -

  1. changes on 10,11, 15,16,17 seem to be based upon an old version of spojbackup.py. Base your changes on latest - https://github.com/ideamonk/spojbackup/blob/master/spojbackup.py
  2. changes have conflicting tab sizes

Now, that you have had to alter the url "http://spoj.pl" everywhere, how about putting it out in a global and re-using it as a base url wherever needed? (in that way we could also add support for spoj.br, etc, later, with ease)

Authors and contributors are maintained in README, changes to copyright info, authors are unwelcome.

So, would you be sending a revised pull request?

Thanks!

ideamonk avatar Jan 29 '13 05:01 ideamonk

Sorry for the late reply. At present i am busy with my other projects and college work. So, i won't be sending a revised pull request anytime soon.

Thanks.

---Rishi Poddar

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Abhishek Mishra [email protected]:

I understand that changes to spoj urls & in the ways they serve results might've been the root cause. If so, it would've also failed at authentication stage. Anyway,

I wouldn't be merging this straight off because -

  1. changes on 10,11, 15,16,17 seem to be based upon an old version of spojbackup.py. Base your changes on latest - https://github.com/ideamonk/spojbackup/blob/master/spojbackup.py
  2. changes have conflicting tab sizes

Now, that you have had to alter the url "http://spoj.pl" everywhere, how about putting it out in a global and re-using it as a base url wherever needed? (in that way we could also add support for spoj.br, etc, later, with ease)

Authors and contributors are maintained in README, changes to copyright info, authors are unwelcome.

So, would you be sending a revised pull request?

Thanks!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ideamonk/spojbackup/pull/2#issuecomment-12820849.

rkpoddar avatar Feb 06 '13 16:02 rkpoddar

No probs :)

ideamonk avatar Feb 07 '13 10:02 ideamonk