rust-typed-builder icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
rust-typed-builder copied to clipboard

Additional generic traits for setters

Open radekvit opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Is there a way to add additional generics bounds on field setters?

This would help in cases where setting bounds in the struct definition is annoying (which is most of the time), but the structure only makes sense with specific trait bounds. In my use-case, I use () as the alternative to a T: SomeTrait, and only implement functionality for T: SomeTrait. The setter is only useful in cases where the T implements some additional traits.

use typed_builder::TypedBuilder;

#[derive(TypedBuilder)]
struct Generic<T: Default> {
    //                                      vvv The new syntax could be something like this
    #[builder(default, setter(strip_option, generic_bounds = Send + Sync))]
    optional_thing: Option<T>,
}

struct Defaults(*const i32);

impl Default for Defaults {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self(&0 as *const i32)
    }
}

fn foo() {
    // ERROR: .optional_thing can only be called with T that's Default + Send + Sync
    Generic::builder().optional_thing(Defaults::default());
}

radekvit avatar Nov 19 '23 13:11 radekvit

Why not just add the bounds on the generic when defining it?

#[derive(TypedBuilder)]
struct Generic<T: Default + Send + Sync> {

idanarye avatar Nov 19 '23 13:11 idanarye

Because T doesn't necessarily have to have those bounds - they're only important if they're set.

Consider a bound MyCustomTrait, where T can be either T: MyCustomTrait, or (). I'll only want to set the Option to Some when T is not (), and it needs to implement the trait.

radekvit avatar Nov 20 '23 17:11 radekvit