Add a versatile nodeset generator
closes https://github.com/idaholab/moose/issues/5895 refs https://github.com/idaholab/moose/issues/28881
To get around difficulties reported in #28869 using the Gmsh reader. This is not the best motivation, but I can see this being useful regardless
Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on 28b6fa1 wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on 28b6fa1 wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
| c80f51 | #28873 28b6fa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 85.08% | 85.09% | +0.02% | 96.23% | |
| Hits | 106568 | 106720 | +152 | 153 | |
| Misses | 18695 | 18696 | +1 | 6 | |
Modules coverage
Coverage did not change
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework -
chemical_reactions -
combined -
contact -
electromagnetics -
external_petsc_solver -
fluid_properties -
fsi -
functional_expansion_tools -
geochemistry -
heat_transfer -
level_set -
misc -
navier_stokes -
optimization -
peridynamics -
phase_field -
porous_flow -
ray_tracing -
rdg -
reactor -
richards -
scalar_transport -
solid_mechanics -
solid_properties -
stochastic_tools -
thermal_hydraulics -
xfem
This comment will be updated on new commits.
@pbehne would you have time to review? This is very close to what you did for sidesets
@pbehne would you have time to review? This is very close to what you did for sidesets
I'll take a look in the coming week!
Starting on this now.
thanks! @roystgnr @lindsayad for the ccb review?
or @cticenhour if you want newsletter content 📰
Test failures are unrelated.
Thanks for the reviews!