moose
moose copied to clipboard
Add physics for fully coupled k-epsilon
TODO:
- [ ] documentation
- [ ] add energy wall function
- [ ] add cross-parameter checking between BCs for energy & k-eps
- [ ] add cross-parameter checking between wall momentum and k-eps BCs
- [ ] expand testing reasonably. There are already 14 regression tests for turbulence trying out each wall function
It might take a bit to finish this. There's a lot, and a lot of options that don't work together. I ll get back to Components
Job Documentation on f72b921 wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage on f72b921 wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
1da09a | #27614 f72b92 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
Rate | 85.04% | 85.05% | +0.00% | 93.33% | |
Hits | 105891 | 105904 | +13 | 14 | |
Misses | 18622 | 18621 | -1 | 1 |
Modules coverage
Navier stokes
1da09a | #27614 f72b92 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
Rate | 84.54% | 84.59% | +0.04% | 83.87% | |
Hits | 16356 | 16765 | +409 | 468 | |
Misses | 2990 | 3055 | +65 | 90 |
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework
-
chemical_reactions
-
combined
-
contact
-
electromagnetics
-
external_petsc_solver
-
fluid_properties
-
fsi
-
functional_expansion_tools
-
geochemistry
-
heat_transfer
-
level_set
-
misc
-
navier_stokes
-
optimization
-
peridynamics
-
phase_field
-
porous_flow
-
ray_tracing
-
rdg
-
reactor
-
richards
-
scalar_transport
-
solid_mechanics
-
solid_properties
-
stochastic_tools
-
thermal_hydraulics
-
xfem
Warnings
-
navier_stokes
new line coverage rate 83.87% is less than the suggested 90.0%
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Failure should be catchable in debug mode. I ll find it today or tomorrow, ready for a look otherwise
@tanoret this should be ready for review!
After this we should decide whether we take an intermediate step of adding segregated-nonlinear support to the Physics, or create an entire set of Physics for the linear solver
@tanoret if/when this looks good to you, I'll review/approve
Thanks for the reviews!
Seems it broke next on some distributed runs. I ll work on this now