moose
moose copied to clipboard
idaholab
Add physics for two-phase mixture flow
I'm fairly confident it's correctly reproducing the kernels, using the DumpObjectProblem with an upgrade I added
The doco on two phase mixture is a bit lacking now. It would be good to add a page in doc/content/modules/navier_stokes at some point.
Thoughts on first & other phase?
Do you prefer:
- first and second?
- liquid and dispersed?
- main and dispersed?
- dispersed and other?
refs #22637
Job Documentation on 73484b6 wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage on 73484b6 wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
| ca913d | #27517 73484b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 85.08% | 85.07% | -0.01% | 74.14% | |
| Hits | 104117 | 104125 | +8 | 43 | |
| Misses | 18265 | 18274 | +9 | 15 | |
Modules coverage
Navier stokes
| ca913d | #27517 73484b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 84.18% | 84.01% | -0.17% | 69.82% | |
| Hits | 17037 | 17329 | +292 | 317 | |
| Misses | 3201 | 3298 | +97 | 137 | |
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework -
chemical_reactions -
combined -
contact -
electromagnetics -
external_petsc_solver -
fluid_properties -
fsi -
functional_expansion_tools -
geochemistry -
heat_transfer -
level_set -
misc -
navier_stokes -
optimization -
peridynamics -
phase_field -
porous_flow -
ray_tracing -
rdg -
reactor -
richards -
scalar_transport -
solid_mechanics -
solid_properties -
stochastic_tools -
thermal_hydraulics -
xfem
Warnings
-
frameworknew line coverage rate 74.14% is less than the suggested 90.0% -
navier_stokesnew line coverage rate 69.82% is less than the suggested 90.0%
This comment will be updated on new commits.
That distributed failure is concerning. It's on the same model as affected by the 5 ghost layer requirements valgrind isnt saying anything https://civet.inl.gov/job/2246126/
