moose
moose copied to clipboard
idaholab
Addfreundlich
Closes #22382
Not sure which module would be most appropriate to add this functionality to.
Yes. This is for mass transfer. I will rebase, sorry about that. I'm not sure how to make a test for an interfacekernel. How does that work?
Job Documentation on 8d1875b wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage on 8d1875b wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
| c62e4c | #22383 8d1875 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 84.30% | 84.26% | -0.04% | 24.59% | |
| Hits | 80164 | 80175 | +11 | 15 | |
| Misses | 14927 | 14977 | +50 | 46 | |
Modules coverage
Coverage did not change
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework -
chemical_reactions -
combined -
contact -
electromagnetics -
external_petsc_solver -
fluid_properties -
fsi -
functional_expansion_tools -
geochemistry -
heat_conduction -
level_set -
misc -
navier_stokes -
peridynamics -
phase_field -
porous_flow -
ray_tracing -
rdg -
reactor -
richards -
solid_properties -
stochastic_tools -
tensor_mechanics -
thermal_hydraulics -
xfem
Warnings
-
frameworknew line coverage rate 24.59% is less than the suggested 90.0%
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Yes. This is for mass transfer. I will rebase, sorry about that. I'm not sure how to make a test for an interfacekernel. How does that work?
Use it in an input file that gets run by the test harness. I might suggest weighting a week or two for us to submit the pull request that creates the scalar transport module (we are waiting on final export control approval), because I think this object fits the best in that module
https://github.com/idaholab/moose/pull/22392 will introduce the scalar_transport module which would be a good place for your code