moose
moose copied to clipboard
idaholab
Propagate harmonic interpolation method option to Navier Stokes
refs #21923
No regolds! Our viscosities must be constant over all of NS. This will change with K-eps
This does not touch the mixing length. I dont see a big need to improve it as we ll move to regularized K-epsilon soon
Job Documentation on 50c36c6 wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage on 50c36c6 wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
| 993b03 | #22381 50c36c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 84.30% | 84.29% | -0.01% | 31.82% | |
| Hits | 80166 | 80169 | +3 | 7 | |
| Misses | 14925 | 14938 | +13 | 15 | |
Modules coverage
Navier stokes
| 993b03 | #22381 50c36c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 85.50% | 85.53% | +0.02% | 85.00% | |
| Hits | 9766 | 9773 | +7 | 17 | |
| Misses | 1656 | 1654 | -2 | 3 | |
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework -
chemical_reactions -
combined -
contact -
electromagnetics -
external_petsc_solver -
fluid_properties -
fsi -
functional_expansion_tools -
geochemistry -
heat_conduction -
level_set -
misc -
navier_stokes -
peridynamics -
phase_field -
porous_flow -
ray_tracing -
rdg -
reactor -
richards -
solid_properties -
stochastic_tools -
tensor_mechanics -
thermal_hydraulics -
xfem
Warnings
-
frameworknew line coverage rate 31.82% is less than the suggested 90.0% -
navier_stokesnew line coverage rate 85.00% is less than the suggested 90.0%
This comment will be updated on new commits.