moose
moose copied to clipboard
idaholab
Porosity and smoothed porosity changes
Job Documentation on 7b05beb wanted to post the following:
View the site here
This comment will be updated on new commits.
Job Coverage on 7b05beb wanted to post the following:
Framework coverage
| 10e5c0 | #21491 7b05be | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 84.26% | 84.26% | +0.00% | 100.00% | |
| Hits | 79693 | 79717 | +24 | 23 | |
| Misses | 14891 | 14890 | -1 | 0 | |
Modules coverage
Navier stokes
| 10e5c0 | #21491 7b05be | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | +/- | New | ||
| Rate | 85.44% | 85.45% | +0.01% | 95.83% | |
| Hits | 9747 | 9753 | +6 | 23 | |
| Misses | 1661 | 1661 | - | 1 | |
Full coverage reports
Reports
-
framework -
chemical_reactions -
combined -
contact -
electromagnetics -
external_petsc_solver -
fluid_properties -
fsi -
functional_expansion_tools -
geochemistry -
heat_conduction -
level_set -
misc -
navier_stokes -
peridynamics -
phase_field -
porous_flow -
ray_tracing -
rdg -
reactor -
richards -
solid_properties -
stochastic_tools -
tensor_mechanics -
thermal_hydraulics -
xfem
This comment will be updated on new commits.
@lindsayad Pgh patch ready
I added a debug functor functionality. It s not the most detailed thing, but it really really helped debugging what was going on with this PR. I was using porosity instead of smoothed_porosity in some objects in Pronghorn & in NSFV action and could not figure it out
Probably unrelated I think I have a PR up for that stochastic tool failure we re seeing
Haha did you even look? Two of the failures are from your show_functors test