Icinga Migration

**Updated by tobiasvdk on 2016-12-02 10:52:43 +00:00** As discussed with @tgelf this is a feature. You can have any character in your service object name so it's not necessary to...

**Updated by plarivee on 2016-12-02 11:18:29 +00:00** Only use case I cold see right now is being able to have "display\_name" that are not unique. Not that big of a...

**Updated by tobiasvdk on 2016-12-02 13:08:42 +00:00** plarivee wrote: > Only use case I cold see right now is being able to have "display\_name" that are not unique. Not that...

**Updated by geotek on 2016-12-04 10:07:01 +00:00** I would not miss the display name if obsoleted. As it is now, it does more harm than good. For example when manually...

**Updated by plarivee on 2016-12-04 13:43:08 +00:00** I disagree, Having the option to set display name is way simpler and less confusing when using apply rules for our end user....

**Updated by thoth on 2015-03-21 16:59:42 +00:00** this is due to the architecture of docker containers and merely obscures my original issue, this one can be closed, I'll post another...

**Updated by thoth on 2015-03-25 14:36:17 +00:00** looking back at this and the prevalence of docker this might be worth keeping open and working on. I believe the solution involves...

**Updated by mfriedrich on 2014-08-14 11:13:56 +00:00** * **Project** changed from _53_ to _Icinga Tools_ * **Category** deleted ~~193~~

**Updated by mfriedrich on 2014-08-14 11:15:47 +00:00** * **Category** set to _205_

**Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-01-27 14:11:24 +00:00** * **Project** changed from _Icinga Tools_ to _icinga2-ansible_ * **Category** deleted ~~205~~