Gaurav Mehta

Hi @irishgordo i suspect you need to delete and re-created the VirtualMachineImport object. In the current rc, the vm-import-controller is using ephermeral storage. With the move to addons soon we...

@irishgordo thanks for giving it a thorough run.. I will try and answer all questions.. https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/2274#issuecomment-1264146111 I will add checks to ensure we convert, the VM name is made rfc...

@irishgordo with regards to: https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/2274#issuecomment-1266052747 There is a check which will clean up object ownership once the VM is in a `Running` state. Deleting the VirtualMachineImport object before the VM...

@irishgordo for https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/2274#issuecomment-1266220335 If the source to destination is invalid due to any reason, not limited to incorrect network definitions, or network not present, then the interface will by default...

@irishgordo for https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/2274#issuecomment-1266220335, I need to check the api response for the VM's. I suspect this is happening because openstack is creating two interfaces one for internal network and one...

the source is not ready. Likely because of incorrect datacenter specification in the vmware source. We can definitely improve the logging in the controller to help identify these issues better.

are you able to update the addon to use the latest image `rancher/harvester-vm-import-controller:main-head` this has additional changes to print the actual error when check fails.

we might need to wait for future releases of harvester for kernel 5.16 to be available. Intel AMX was only made available in kernel 5.16

the manifest for agent is generated via this template: https://github.com/rancher/rancher/blob/release/v2.7/pkg/systemtemplate/template.go#L3 That seems to be generated from here: https://github.com/rancher/rancher/blob/release/v2.7/pkg/systemtemplate/import.go#L161 Might be useful to check what the cluster spec and also the...

@starbops @bk201 should we look at a rancher UI enhancement to allow this at the project level?