Sawood Alam

I was making some changes in the Reconstructive after which rewriting of the `Location` header on the server-side will not be needed.

I will perhaps merge it tomorrow. I have made necessary changes, but did not get a chance to test it. I left those uncommitted changes in my office machine and...

It looks like it is not possible currently as necessary information (for example the `Location` header) is not exposed when redirects are handled in manual mode (which is necessary to...

No, for the response type `opaqueredirect`, status is 0, status message is the empty byte sequence, header list is empty, body is null, and trailer is empty. The information is...

Changes in #461 might fix it, but they need to be tested in different scenarios.

> Why were the rates with threading so much lower? I would expect them to be higher on average. I am not sure about that yet. I did note that...

This PR brings some functional changes, so we should sit on it a little longer and test it in different ways in different environments first. Also, it is important to...

I have been trying to profile this and observed some really strange behaviors. We need to isolate certain things in a separate script and test them. Also, before merging we...

Created a separate benchmarking repository ([IPFS API Concurrency Test](https://github.com/ibnesayeed/ipfsapi-concurrency-test)) and reported the observation in the API repo (https://github.com/ipfs/py-ipfs-api/issues/131).

> maybe i'm missing a point, but have you considered to put a wsgi daemon in front of ipwb? No, currently we are serving directly from the built-in Flask server....