Ian Bell
Ian Bell
Yes, you are right that the fugacity coefficients (and likewise the chemical potentials and fugacities) should be the same in both phases. They will not be exactly the same due...
Yes you need to be looking in ``src/CoolProp.i`` for which headers get included in the SWIG interface (ignore the pybind11 stuff, that is for python binding), and I think you...
Or you might want to add a small passthrough function analogously to how ``add_fluids_as_JSON`` is handled in ``CoolProp.h`` and ``CoolProp.cpp``
A better solution would be to mirror the arguments, not changing the function name, and allow the kind of simple mixing rule to be passed through to the call. If...
As I mentioned in the PR, I think it is a bad idea to change the core of CoolProp. I prefer we figure out why the simple passthrough wasn't working...
There is a long and boring story here, but I made a mistake in my paper based on a mistake in REFPROP 9 that I followed. Indeed all those that...
Yes, all the R1234ZE should be replaced with R1234ZEE. Or it might make sense to replace all names with their default CoolProp names, if someone is going to go through...
Correct; beta_Xij = 1/beta_Xji, for X in {T,V} gamma_Xij = gamma_Xji, for X in {T,V}
It's been a while since I messed with this in CoolProp, but I believe that there is no way to reliably set the mixture reference state in CoolProp. I think...
That's definitely a bug. Wet bulb inputs are some of the trickiest to deal with; I have lost many hours (and hair) trying to make those routines more reliable. Someone...