Ian

I genuinely appreciate the response, and I'm grateful for the attention being paid to this issue. That said, after reviewing the behavior in `0.29.0` I believe your https://github.com/arduino/arduino-cli/issues/1092#issuecomment-1327614240 misses 2...

Could we get the `status: waiting for information` label removed, or is there additional info needed?

I ran into trouble with this, and the only way around it seems to be to use the `.eager` method that was added in Ruby 2.7 to turn a lazy...

I found a solution to this while developing an unrelated project: use `IO.pipe` to handle all the buffering. That solves both the lazy/eager enumerator problem and the buffering. Contributing it...

@lautis > In the Ruby IO object, each_line takes the line separator and limit as arguments. Would that be possible to include here? I worked around your suggestion by yielding...

Is this project abandoned?

We've been discussing this issue fairly heavily since WWDC in June, when Apple first announced this would happen. Within the past week, Apple has started closing radar bugs that we've...

The short answer is that we have a lot invested (in terms of tests) in Illuminator, and our current plan is to support Illuminator as long as Apple supports UIAutomation....

We are currently blocked due to Apple's implementation of `XCUIElement`, which appears to call `XCTAssert` inside various properties (instead of throwing exceptions). [OpenRadar issue is here](https://openradar.appspot.com/radar?id=5468663243079680), and [forum thread started...

Now that iOS 8 support is being dropped in most places, a lot of the integration headaches we were having have disappeared. Swift 2.3 didn't hurt either. I'm pleased to...