Conversations icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
Conversations copied to clipboard

Group video calls

Open sualko opened this issue 5 years ago • 10 comments

I plan to integrate group video calls (https://github.com/jsxc/jsxc/issues/3) into @jsxc, but I would like to have max. compatibility with the leading android xmpp app :wink:.

Do you have any plans in this direction? What do you think is the best xep? XEP-0272: Multiparty Jingle seams not to bad for a p2p attempt and XEP-0340: COnferences with LIghtweight BRIdging is probably the standard for a setup with videobridge. Of course a solution which mixes all streams (at least audio streams) into one, similar to @BigBlueButton, would be nice too.

sualko avatar Sep 28 '20 10:09 sualko

Dino is receiving funding to implement conference video calls and I will probably wait to see what they come up with and implement something that is compatible later (after them). I have a full plate of other projects so I’m not in a rush.

IMHO you/one/I probably want bridging as this is the only approach that scales beyond 3-4 participants. (as opposed to P2P). However that leaves you with having to adopt or develop from scratch a bridge which I'm really not in the mood for. One can probably try to reuse the Jitsi Video bridge which apparently uses COLIBRI plus a few extensions. But the Jitsi Developers were not super keen on documenting those changes or cooperating in that regard. That’s another reason for me to wait until Dino (which again has the funding for that) to 'solve' the bridge problem.

Once a bridge exists and is properly documented implementing the client side might actually not be that much work.

I’m hearing from the Dino people that they are looking into both bridging and P2P. Depending on how things are going I may or may not skip the P2P part and only implement the bridged version. (Which I think kinda answers your question.)

iNPUTmice avatar Sep 30 '20 17:09 iNPUTmice

Janus could probably also be used with a colibri extension, see discussion about that here: https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/meetecho-janus/0M320-k21Is

Source is here: https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway

poVoq avatar Sep 30 '20 21:09 poVoq

Other messengers have solved this by linking a Jitsi meet instance, see https://delta.chat/en/2020-07-30-summer-update

When basicWebRTC is detected, they can even embed the call (I did not try this, yet). Maybe they have code which can be reused.

allo- avatar Oct 21 '20 16:10 allo-

That would be XMPP inception as Jitsi Meet is a somewhat borked version (including even a separated XMPP server) of exactly the thing described here as the preferred solution, aka COLIBRI XEP.

poVoq avatar Oct 21 '20 17:10 poVoq

As a user I am mostly interested in a solution that works. For group chat I really like the Jitsi meet app at the moment, but you cannot call someone and have them in the room. For 1:1 you can call in Conversations and it works real great. As a developer I assume you're rather working on a real integrated solution and it is probably the best thing to do.

The question is how fast you assume to get the perfect solution and if a simple solution would be a good idea in the meantime. Currently I just share the conferences link from jitsi meet to conversations, but with a better integration I could imagine that Conversations could ring and the recipient then gets a prompt "accept video group chat invitation" with the same UX as 1:1 calls have.

I'll just add this here as my thought from the issue linked above that I closed when it was marked as duplicate of this one.

allo- avatar Oct 21 '20 17:10 allo-

I don't know anybody that's tried it (myself included), but the just-released Dino 0.3 has support for group audio and video calls now. It's my understanding that this is done in a totally peer-to-peer fashion, and also that Dino is the only client supporting this so far.

jscott0 avatar Feb 15 '22 16:02 jscott0

JSXC also seems to support it: https://www.jsxc.org/blog/2021/08/31/A-group-call-proposal.html

poVoq avatar Feb 15 '22 17:02 poVoq

@jscott0 yes, and once XEPs/updates stabilize a bit the ecosystem might pick them up

licaon-kter avatar Feb 15 '22 19:02 licaon-kter

@poVoq we developed our own version of group video calls (with and without bridge), but did not release it yet, since we do not want to create a standard without xep. It's similar to Dinos implementation, but not compatible. Our discussion did not result in a draft. Maybe we have to put a new effort into this.

sualko avatar Feb 21 '22 17:02 sualko

My little word: For me, the best solution is p2p without bridge. We previously used Nextcloud talk and I used it without hassle for group video chat for 3-4 clients. Talk supports janus bridge too. Simpler - better :)

jookk avatar Nov 19 '22 11:11 jookk