Michaela Iorga

@aj-stein-nist and team - the meeting was scheduled on Feb 7th, at 12:30, as virtual office hour.

### 02/09/2023 Update: I met with the team on Feb 7th, and the feedback and the discussion was captured [here](https://hackmd.io/UrSjUKGiQRuiA2VJLG-Mpg)

- The following **ADR for GH Labels** will be submitted as a PR if no other comments are received prior to Feb 21, 2023, EOB. - For additional actions related...

## 02/23/2023 I propose creating a new issue around how to best tell the story (AJ's proposal) and spike it in the next sprint. I am planning to create the...

@Compton-NIST and @aj-stein-nist - can we have a meeting this week (virtual is OK) to discuss this issue, the Feb OSCAL DEFINE meeting and possible relation to this issue and...

> We can meet after the fact, but I would still like a sitrep in a comment in the issue on the interim later this week. Thanks. Absolutely! It si...

> * There is also a question whether CRM needs an independent model if it is primarily made of the same assemblies as the SSP, just with a more limited...

@wendellpiez - This old PR is still marked as work in progress but it has already too many conflicts. Can you please rebase and resubmit it?

@wendellpiez - we can close the PR if the work was already merged by other PRs, but this PR was opened in Sept 2022, and was never pulled for review...

> Perhaps related: the subsequent (to "Backmatter Resolution") section ["Metadata Resolution"](https://pages.nist.gov/OSCAL/concepts/processing/profile-resolution/#d2e1433-head) first bullet asserts "The output catalog's metadata MUST have a unique top-level UUID (metadata:uuid)…". The metadata element does not...