iDigBio Bot

Results 130 comments of iDigBio Bot

Comment by Lee Belbin (@Tasilee) migrated from spreadsheet: Basically, the statement needs to be min max depths ok

Comment by Paul Morris (@chicoreus) migrated from spreadsheet: Split into separate Validation and Amendment, Validation=1, amendment needs more specification.

Comment by Paula Zermoglio (@pzermoglio) migrated from spreadsheet: This is assuming that eventDate was not interpreted from day, month, year to begin with, right? If not, a "passed test" would...

Comment by Christian Gendreau (@cgendreau) migrated from spreadsheet: I would say more "parsable" than valid since the validity depends on the context

Comment by Arthur Chapman (@ArthurChapman) migrated from spreadsheet: 200 meters refers to only a few datums (Australia?) - In NAD27-WGS84 can be as high as 480 meters (from memory) in...

Comment by Arthur Chapman (@ArthurChapman) migrated from spreadsheet: For NOTES Column

Comment by Arthur Chapman (@ArthurChapman) migrated from spreadsheet: Should we change name to GEODETIC_DATUM_AMBIGUOUS and make warning type Ambiguous?

Comment by Paula Zermoglio (@pzermoglio) migrated from spreadsheet: Order matters, useful AFTER interpretation of verbatim if no decimalLat and decimaLong were provided.

Comment by Lee Belbin (@Tasilee) migrated from spreadsheet: Response to PJM comments (#6a) on dateModified equivalent for eventDate - and scores copied from 6a for consistency (no gaps)

Comment by Lee Belbin (@Tasilee) migrated from spreadsheet: Added post scoring for completeness