Consider removing `source` from `Transfer` instructions

[dima74]

Consider transfer instruction, e.g. Transfer<Account, DomainId, Account>. It checks that source (provided by ISI) equals domain owner (as stored in blockchain):

https://github.com/hyperledger-iroha/iroha/blob/e0ff84276bb5ff41786f6886aaa8225e70d686ce/crates/iroha_core/src/smartcontracts/isi/domain.rs#L362-L366

Consider removing source from ISI and using domain owner directly. Also applicable for CLI (e.g. even if we will keep source in ISI, we can remove source in CLI)

---

To update the ownership of an object, the object id and the new owner id should be sufficient arguments. So struct Transfer<S, O, D> enforces unnecessary invariant checks for ownership changes

Originally posted by @s8sato in https://github.com/hyperledger-iroha/iroha/pull/5308#discussion_r1948387955

[s8sato]

Yeah, every Transfer<S, O, D> can change into Transfer<O, D>, including numeric asset transfers, which can be considered ownership changes for partial balances (O = Asset)