Hyan Mandian

Yes, even with tree shaking we have a problem because today our tree shaking is not so good :( I think that we have 2 ways to fix that, the...

Nice idea @pedrovsp ! First, we need to deprecate this function with `// @deprecated ` annotation with the reason and maybe provide some alternative (like `@brazilian-utils/getCities` or something like that)....

Nice thoughts @saculbr ! I prefer `@brazilian-utils/cities`, as you said, makes more sense, but since tree shaking works fine like you comments in #157 , I don't know if we...

We just need to decide what we should do. At first, I thought that deprecate this function and create another package make sense, but after @morhogg discovered in #157 that...

Yes.. What do you think about it?

Or we can do what @andreoav suggested. I know that this approach it's correct, but I would not like to do that :(

Because today `getCities` (without the state) returns the wrong data and can cause issues. For example, in the current project that I work on, we replace `getCities` with a call...

@arantespp can you help us to fix `getCities`? (I can do that, but right now I'm entering on a little vacation and I prefer to stay away from any code...

Hello @Isaius sorry for the delay :( . Right now I don't have much time to focus on current issues. If you know how to improve that, please, be comfortable...

Nice idea @LucasCarrias we just need to confirm if Docsify has support for that, can you help us with that?