Change array indent from 4 to 2 spaces

[ofek]

@hukkin If it's alright with you, this seems to be preferred by most people and is also used in the examples https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0#array

[hukkin]

Thanks for the PR!

this seems to be preferred by most people

What do you base this on? I feel like most INI conf files are using 4 spaces.

I think I don't want to make changes like this without a good reason.

[ofek]

.ini yes for sure but .toml I've mostly seen 2.

The official examples https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0#array and https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0621/#example

tomlkit does 2 (which is how I noticed), toml uses 2 in examples https://github.com/uiri/toml#quick-tutorial

The modern Visual Studio Code toml extension uses 2 https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=tamasfe.even-better-toml#formatting

Looking through https://github.com/toml-lang/toml/wiki#v100-compliant the ones that put examples use 2:

• https://github.com/ToruNiina/toml11#preserving-comments
• https://github.com/BurntSushi/toml#more-complex-usage
• https://github.com/status-im/nim-toml-serialization#parse-inline-table-with-newline

Also the majority seems to use 2 when searching GitHub for pyproject.toml or Cargo.toml

Bonus: smaller file sizes 😄

[ofek]

Just let me know!

[hukkin]

Hey, sorry for the silence! I honestly just find it hard to make a decision on this, because I think ultimately this is a minor detail that I don't find that important. It feels easier less disturbing to just not change anything.

You make fair points about 2 spaces being used in many places, but I've also seen 4 spaces used a lot, and none of your resources are "style guides" with any sort of reasoning behind the decision.

Also, what I absolutely want to avoid is changing indent size more than once, so we should get it right. There's also an argument to be made for using a tab, but yeah I find all of this uninteresting and unimportant.

[ofek]

cc @pradyunsg I'm curious your thoughts since you're heavily involved in both Python and TOML 🙂

[pradyunsg]

This is primarily personal opinion, but I do think 2 is better than 4 here. I also recognise that the choice to use 2 in the spec is a part of why various places that spew out TOML using two spaces instead of four spaces.

I don’t feel strongly about using my opinions as a hammer, but yea, I think it’s reasonable to accept this; if consistency across other major TOML projects is valuable to you.

[brettcannon]

I would definitely not take PEP 621 as an example of any practice, but instead whatever @pradyunsg says. 😉

[hukkin]

Thanks all, I really appreciate the feedback!

I have maximum respect for pradyunsg's work on TOML (and FOSS in general!) but here I find it hard to put much special weight on their (or any single person's) opinion, because as they mentioned, it's just a personal opinion without objective reasoning. Similarly I wouldn't ask Guido if I should use single quotes or double quotes in Python. I use what I like the most (or more realistically refer to a third party opinionated style guide (Black)).

I don't think it's a good idea to use TOML spec as style guide because a) AFAIK it doesn't intend to be one and b) it is very inconsistent style-wise, and actually almost has to be so to be able to demonstrate all the language features. For multi-line array whitespace only you can find at least 3 different whitespace styles in the spec.

So far the only objective argument for 2 spaces is "consistency across major TOML projects", but I don't currently see the value. If you think there is any, feel free to explain it to me!

I actually find it interesting that Python people prefer 2 spaces, because after countless hours of looking at 4 space indented Python code my eyes prefer 4 spaces.

With all this said, if we get more thumbs-ups or comments asking for this, sure let's merge this. I don't care that much. :smile: I just don't want to make the change for no reason or switch to a style that fewer people like.

[hukkin]

A side-note: my gut feeling is still that Python people gravitate towards 4 spaces when writing TOML (or INI) by hand. One example is the tomlkit author who yes went with 2 spaces in tomlkit but uses 4 spaces in hand-written pyproject.toml files in poetry, poetry-core and pendulum repositories.

[ofek]

I just rebased.

If your preference is 4, would you be open to adding an option then? I'm going to introduce a pyproject.toml file to every Datadog integration very, very soon and 2 spaces (subjectively) looks much nicer.

[ofek]

my gut feeling is still that Python people gravitate towards 4 spaces when writing TOML (or INI) by hand

I think there are two things wrong with that:

1. Every serializer targets users of the format, not the users of the language in which the serializer was written. As @pradyunsg said:

   I think it’s reasonable to accept this; if consistency across other major TOML projects is valuable to you

2. My intuition is that the vast majority of users use an IDE/editor (terminal or GUI) with auto-complete functionality. As such, if for example you type [ the completion will do [|] with your cursor in the center and when you press Enter indentation will happen automatically based on the file type (or preferences) or auto-detected for existing files. When TOML support is implemented in each, the default indent will be based on the spec + its examples and the network effect of whatever most others are using. In this case, they would end up at 2 for both.

[hukkin]

If your preference is 4, would you be open to adding an option then?

I'd much prefer having a good default over many control knobs. If configurable output style is important, maybe tomlkit is a better fit for your needs?

Maybe that good default is 2 spaces though? I still don't know for sure.

I'm going to introduce a pyproject.toml file to every Datadog integration very, very soon and 2 spaces (subjectively) looks much nicer.

I don't appreciate being pressurized to make decisions based on the needs of corporations that don't pay me.

I think there are two things wrong with that:

I think you're making the assumption that the spec is a style guide, which as I mentioned, I don't think is a great assumption. The spec's examples are inconsistent style wise.

On https://toml.io/en/ and https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0 you'll find style such as:

# inconsistent space at the start and end of the array
nested_mixed_array = [ [ 1, 2 ], ["a", "b", "c"] ]

# two space indent
contributors = [
  "Foo Bar <[email protected]>",
  { name = "Baz Qux", email = "[email protected]", url = "https://example.com/bazqux" }
]

# all items on one line
integers2 = [
  1, 2, 3
]

# indent width based on the first line
points = [ { x = 1, y = 2, z = 3 },
           { x = 7, y = 8, z = 9 },
           { x = 2, y = 4, z = 8 } ]

My point is: there is no consistency, the spec is not a style guide.

[ofek]

being pressurized

Not my intent! I was trying to express the fact that I'm actually using the library and not just a random person making a busy work PR 🙂

there is no consistency, the spec is not a style guide

Sure. I guess my question is if tomli-w didn't exist and you were to write it today, would you still choose 4? If not, does the existence warrant apprehension to changing the default?

[ofek]

@hukkin Hello again! I just wanted to follow up on this 🙂

[asweigart]

I think an indent keyword argument like json.dumps() has (with a default value of 4 to match tomli-w's current style), but I also support not having so many control knobs as well. Changing the indentation from 4 to 2 will result in people asking to have it changed from 2 to 4, but putting in this knob will also lead to people asking for other control knobs (such as the other parameters in json.dumps().)

[wimglenn]

Is this repo still maintained? No changes for years