Taneli Hukkinen

Any thoughts on changing Tomli's build backend from flit_core to poetry_core? Poetry_core already bundles a TOML parser so I assume packagers who can't accept that already have a process in...

> Even if they have streamlined unbundling in general, unbundling in this case just puts you back in the same dependency cycle (whether that's flit_core tomli, or poetry_core tomlkit). So...

Thanks! I'll try to find the time to review this in the future. I will say already that I'm not 100% sure yet that I want this fixed, at least...

Same issue with dates it seems: ```python rtoml.dumps(rtoml.loads("date = 2021-01-01")) ```

[docformatter](https://github.com/myint/docformatter) already exists. IMO would be great if Black didn't alter AST any more than it already does.

https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2858 has no longer happened to me since a few days when I increased `--target-peers` from 80 (the default) to 140. Perhaps this information is useful to other lighthouse users...

It might be a good idea to flip the switch sooner rather than later. If I understand things correctly, annotations relying on "implicit optional" are no longer PEP 484 compliant...

Thanks, this is great! I added a couple tests and merged.

Thanks for the issue and the PR! I agree we should change this. I hope I'll have the time to review the PR soon. :smile_cat:

Thanks for the issue @jspaezp ! I'll have to consider whether I want the maintenance burden that this adds. For now, as you mention, it is possible to use the...