Hubertus Tummescheit
Hubertus Tummescheit
I am cheching wiht my team about their thoughts on this one, stay tuned.
With respect to this particular PR it seems to me that the broadest consent is to do nothing for this release, and make a ticket to transfer as much as...
Hello Mani! Yes, I agree with your proposed solution. It's very good to now have met you actually in person!
This looks like a simple solution to a recurring problem. The specification can be lifted from Python. Many Modelica libraries are only lightly connected. Many old libraries from 3.x only...
I would be in favor to add the rewrite proposed by Hans. It makes the event generation explicit. Could you add it to the PR?
Thanks, @casella, for bringing this up. We (Modelon) can speak with several years of experience with this, implemented this in a number of libraries, and I can say that the...
BTW: I suggest to rename the issue to something else than the OM annotation, that coveres the general issue, such as: "Standardized annotations to select iteration variables and residuals "
> This is not correct; it should also be corrected on master. I am not so fluent in git as to know how to do that best: @HansOlsson, couldn't you...
Clarification (I think). The request by GM is not about the old "FMI-for-DAE" effort requiring fully implicit, sparse solvers, , but for exposing algebraic loops in an FMU to an...
Interesting discussion :-). I think there are 2 cases: 1. Exposing internal algebraic loops of a normal dynamic FMU for external solving. I think this can be done as a...