http-extensions
http-extensions copied to clipboard
RESUMABLE: wording of "upload resource SHOULD generate" is "awkward" and "wrong"
@gstrauss provided the following feedback on https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2025JulSep/0094.html wrt Section 4.4.2
The wording of "the upload resource SHOULD generate" is awkward and wrong. The upload resource is a temporary file that is continued (in wording) to be treated by draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload as a magic application object containing the original request headers and once complete acts as an agent executing a lamda function to send the complete request to the target resource. (Please do not reuse any of the jargon that I intentionally misused.)