http-extensions icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
http-extensions copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon httpwg

Date definition in retrofit

Open martinthomson opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

Is it better to have a separate document defining sf-date rather than have it hide in this one?

martinthomson avatar Aug 04 '22 02:08 martinthomson

Absolutely, this should be separate.

(or just revise SF....)

reschke avatar Aug 04 '22 06:08 reschke

There aren't currently any errrata on 8941, so I'd be inclined to do it as a separate doc, I think. Anyone else have an opinion?

mnot avatar Sep 20 '22 23:09 mnot

(if we did replace 8941, the only thing that comes to mind is that we could remove the ABNF, since we've since decided it's distracting / problematic)

mnot avatar Sep 20 '22 23:09 mnot

If we want all parsers to support this, we better should have all parts in a single place. (IMHO)

reschke avatar Sep 21 '22 05:09 reschke

Discussed in interim meeting; sense of the room was to revise SF

mnot avatar Oct 05 '22 22:10 mnot