Segmentation fault: Error: A signal 11 (Segmentation fault) was received.
I just start htop, and it crashed.
❯ htop
FATAL PROGRAM ERROR DETECTED
============================
Please check at https://htop.dev/issues whether this issue has already been reported.
If no similar issue has been reported before, please create a new issue with the following information:
- Your htop version: '3.2.1'
- Your OS and kernel version (uname -a)
- Your distribution and release (lsb_release -a)
- Likely steps to reproduce (How did it happen?)
- Backtrace of the issue (see below)
Error information:
------------------
A signal 11 (Segmentation fault) was received.
Setting information:
--------------------
htop_version=3.2.1;config_reader_min_version=3;fields=53 48 3 4 0 51 18 113 20 53 17 114 18 38 39 40 2 46 47 49 1;hide_kernel_threads=1;hide_userland_threads=0;shadow_other_users=0;show_thread_names=1;show_program_path=1;highlight_base_name=1;highlight_deleted_exe=1;highlight_megabytes=1;highlight_threads=1;highlight_changes=1;highlight_changes_delay_secs=1;find_comm_in_cmdline=1;strip_exe_from_cmdline=1;show_merged_command=1;header_margin=1;screen_tabs=0;detailed_cpu_time=1;cpu_count_from_one=0;show_cpu_usage=1;show_cpu_frequency=1;show_cpu_temperature=1;degree_fahrenheit=0;update_process_names=1;account_guest_in_cpu_meter=1;color_scheme=0;enable_mouse=0;delay=10;hide_function_bar=0;header_layout=two_50_50;column_meters_0=AllCPUs;column_meter_modes_0=1;column_meters_1=Memory Tasks LoadAverage Hostname Uptime DiskIO NetworkIO Systemd CPU;column_meter_modes_1=1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1;tree_view=0;sort_key=46;tree_sort_key=46;sort_direction=-1;tree_sort_direction=-1;tree_view_always_by_pid=1;all_branches_collapsed=0;screen:Main=ELAPSED USER PPID PGRP PID TGID NICE OOM STARTTIME ELAPSED PRIORITY IO_PRIORITY NICE M_VIRT M_RESIDENT M_SHARE STATE PERCENT_CPU PERCENT_MEM TIME Command;.sort_key=PERCENT_CPU;.tree_sort_key=PERCENT_CPU;.tree_view=0;.tree_view_always_by_pid=1;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=-1;.all_branches_collapsed=0;screen:I/O=PID USER IO_PRIORITY IO_RATE IO_READ_RATE IO_WRITE_RATE PERCENT_SWAP_DELAY PERCENT_IO_DELAY Command;.sort_key=IO_RATE;.tree_sort_key=PID;.tree_view=0;.tree_view_always_by_pid=0;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=1;.all_branches_collapsed=0;
Backtrace information:
----------------------
htop(+0x12dcc)[0x564d0598edcc]
htop(CRT_handleSIGSEGV+0xe9)[0x564d05997269]
/usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x38a00)[0x7f70bed8aa00]
htop(Process_updateCPUFieldWidths+0x0)[0x564d0599c560]
htop(+0x3cfe5)[0x564d059b8fe5]
htop(+0x3cb2e)[0x564d059b8b2e]
htop(+0x2a646)[0x564d059a6646]
htop(ScreenManager_run+0x5aa)[0x564d059a706a]
htop(CommandLine_run+0x43e)[0x564d0599775e]
/usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x23290)[0x7f70bed75290]
/usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8a)[0x7f70bed7534a]
htop(_start+0x25)[0x564d0598d075]
To make the above information more practical to work with, please also provide a disassembly of your htop binary. This can usually be done by running the following command:
objdump -d -S -w `which htop` > ~/htop.objdump
Please include the generated file in your report.
Running this program with debug symbols or inside a debugger may provide further insights.
Thank you for helping to improve htop!
[1] 1369654 segmentation fault (core dumped) htop
$ uname -a
Linux Mufasa 6.0.12-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:03:38 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ htop --version
htop 3.2.1
$ lsb_release -a
LSB Version: n/a
Distributor ID: Arch
Description: Arch Linux
Release: rolling
Codename: n/a
My htoprc is htoprc.txt
Maybe your glibc trips on these calculations?
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/blob/4e6ec4a0873c56ca9de63eadf730c5bd677bd8da/Process.c#L1277
Although percentage should be a sane value:
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/blob/4e6ec4a0873c56ca9de63eadf730c5bd677bd8da/linux/LinuxProcessList.c#L1599-L1603
Is it always reproducible (in particular on an idle system)?
Could you try to reproduce under gdb?
Is it always reproducible (in particular on an idle system)?
No, it rarely happens.
Could you try to reproduce under gdb?
It's hard to reproduce this bug, but if I do, I'll let you know.
Two attempts to add a third screen generated these backtrace and objdumps
- Your htop version: '3.4.1-3.4.1'
- Your OS and kernel version (uname -a) Linux dad-B650-GAMING-X-AX-UbuntuStudio 6.14.0-32-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Aug 29 14:21:26 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Your distribution and release (lsb_release -a) No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 25.04 Release: 25.04 Codename: plucky
- Likely steps to reproduce (How did it happen?) While in settings->Screen tried adding new screen
- Backtrace of the issue (see below)
Error information:
A signal 11 (Segmentation fault) was received.
Setting information:
htop_version=3.4.1-3.4.1;config_reader_min_version=3;fields=0 48 17 18 38 39 40 2 46 47 49 1;hide_kernel_threads=1;hide_userland_threads=0;hide_running_in_container=0;shadow_other_users=0;show_thread_names=1;show_program_path=1;highlight_base_name=1;highlight_deleted_exe=1;shadow_distribution_path_prefix=0;highlight_megabytes=1;highlight_threads=1;highlight_changes=1;highlight_changes_delay_secs=5;find_comm_in_cmdline=1;strip_exe_from_cmdline=1;show_merged_command=1;header_margin=1;screen_tabs=1;detailed_cpu_time=1;cpu_count_from_one=1;show_cpu_usage=1;show_cpu_frequency=1;show_cpu_temperature=0;degree_fahrenheit=0;show_cached_memory=1;update_process_names=1;account_guest_in_cpu_meter=1;color_scheme=0;enable_mouse=1;delay=15;hide_function_bar=0;header_layout=two_50_50;column_meters_0=LeftCPUs2 Memory Swap;column_meter_modes_0=1 1 1;column_meters_1=RightCPUs2 Tasks LoadAverage Uptime;column_meter_modes_1=1 2 2 2;tree_view=1;sort_key=47;tree_sort_key=0;sort_direction=-1;tree_sort_direction=1;tree_view_always_by_pid=1;all_branches_collapsed=1;screen:Main=PID USER PRIORITY NICE M_VIRT M_RESIDENT M_SHARE STATE PERCENT_CPU PERCENT_MEM TIME Command;.sort_key=PERCENT_MEM;.tree_sort_key=PID;.tree_view_always_by_pid=1;.tree_view=1;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=1;.all_branches_collapsed=1;screen:I/O=PID USER IO_PRIORITY IO_RATE IO_READ_RATE IO_WRITE_RATE PERCENT_SWAP_DELAY PERCENT_IO_DELAY Command;.sort_key=IO_RATE;.tree_sort_key=PID;.tree_view_always_by_pid=0;.tree_view=0;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=1;.all_branches_collapsed=0;
Backtrace information:
/snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(CRT_handleSIGSEGV+0x127)[0x5d41a33fa0b7] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x45330)[0x7dd845602330] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x2b3de)[0x5d41a340b3de] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(ScreenManager_run+0x2ab)[0x5d41a340a43b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x13f37)[0x5d41a33f3f37] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x1f642)[0x5d41a33ff642] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(ScreenManager_run+0x2ab)[0x5d41a340a43b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(CommandLine_run+0x7d8)[0x5d41a33f8658] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2a1ca)[0x7dd8455e71ca] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b)[0x7dd8455e728b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(_start+0x25)[0x5d41a33f37e5]
To make the above information more practical to work with, please also provide a disassembly of your htop binary. This can usually be done by running the following command:
objdump -d -S -w which htop > ~/htop.objdump
Second crash after trying to add new screen a second time. Error information:
A signal 11 (Segmentation fault) was received.
Setting information:
htop_version=3.4.1-3.4.1;config_reader_min_version=3;fields=0 48 17 18 38 39 40 2 46 47 49 1;hide_kernel_threads=1;hide_userland_threads=0;hide_running_in_container=0;shadow_other_users=0;show_thread_names=0;show_program_path=1;highlight_base_name=0;highlight_deleted_exe=1;shadow_distribution_path_prefix=0;highlight_megabytes=1;highlight_threads=1;highlight_changes=0;highlight_changes_delay_secs=5;find_comm_in_cmdline=1;strip_exe_from_cmdline=1;show_merged_command=0;header_margin=1;screen_tabs=1;detailed_cpu_time=0;cpu_count_from_one=0;show_cpu_usage=1;show_cpu_frequency=0;show_cpu_temperature=0;degree_fahrenheit=0;show_cached_memory=1;update_process_names=0;account_guest_in_cpu_meter=0;color_scheme=0;enable_mouse=1;delay=15;hide_function_bar=0;header_layout=two_50_50;column_meters_0=LeftCPUs2 Memory Swap;column_meter_modes_0=1 1 1;column_meters_1=RightCPUs2 Tasks LoadAverage Uptime;column_meter_modes_1=1 2 2 2;tree_view=0;sort_key=46;tree_sort_key=0;sort_direction=-1;tree_sort_direction=1;tree_view_always_by_pid=0;all_branches_collapsed=0;screen:Main=PID USER PRIORITY NICE M_VIRT M_RESIDENT M_SHARE STATE PERCENT_CPU PERCENT_MEM TIME Command;.sort_key=PERCENT_CPU;.tree_sort_key=PID;.tree_view_always_by_pid=0;.tree_view=0;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=1;.all_branches_collapsed=0;screen:I/O=PID USER IO_PRIORITY IO_RATE IO_READ_RATE IO_WRITE_RATE PERCENT_SWAP_DELAY PERCENT_IO_DELAY Command;.sort_key=IO_RATE;.tree_sort_key=PID;.tree_view_always_by_pid=0;.tree_view=0;.sort_direction=-1;.tree_sort_direction=1;.all_branches_collapsed=0;
Backtrace information:
/snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(CRT_handleSIGSEGV+0x127)[0x5b48794390b7] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x45330)[0x7e35718b8330] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x2b3de)[0x5b487944a3de] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(ScreenManager_run+0x2ab)[0x5b487944943b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x13f37)[0x5b4879432f37] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(+0x1f642)[0x5b487943e642] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(ScreenManager_run+0x2ab)[0x5b487944943b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(CommandLine_run+0x7d8)[0x5b4879437658] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2a1ca)[0x7e357189d1ca] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b)[0x7e357189d28b] /snap/htop/5181/usr/local/bin/htop(_start+0x25)[0x5b48794327e5]
attached is htop.objdump.tar.gz
There was a bug reported recently, that changing the existing CPU count on-the-fly (i.e. change number of CPUs in a VM), can cause crashes. Will have to look into the crash dumps, if these are related though.
Edit: The object dump seems to cover the snap loader executable instead of the actual htop binary. Please try to run a native version.
Edit 2: @kenmac999 Can you take a look at the branch screen-edit-fixes and report back if this fixes your issue? AFAICS your reports are likely unrelated to the original crash.