collapseos
collapseos copied to clipboard
hsoft
postcollapse culture: who are my soulmates?
off topic, but maybe i find "the one idiot" who cares ...
Our civilization is dying and our bankrupt culture prevents us from accepting this predicament (civ.html)
aka: slave morality, blue pills, comfort, ignorance, innocence, pacifism ...
as an antidote, i made a thesis on interpersonal compatibility which could be the basis for a post-collapse culture
https://github.com/milahu/alchi
im trying to answer the question: who are my soulmates?
or: who are my true friends? or: who are my natural friends? or: how must we connect different types of people, so that all can be happy? aka: team composition, small groups, quality, villages, 144 people, dunbar's number
compared to collapseos, my project is a notech approach which works with zero technology aka: primitive culture, minimal culture, natural order opposite of: civilization, high culture, hightech, large groups, safety in numbers
in theory, this would be a topic for experimental psychology so far, its just a wild hypothesis with only anecdotal evidence
in practice, no one cares, cos im a nobody and because stupidity is only defeated by violence (zarathustra: prophets without swords are ridiculed)
Joseph Tainter says that he has no knowledge of a civilization that voluntarily simplifies itself
topic: good violence, the matrix, fight club, mr inbetween
Interesting, there is some potential gems of biblical support for some of your theories on partnering as well.
The name Ishi in Hosea is one such example, if the Lord is our Husband, then we're all married to one another as believers. Of course, the English translations of the Hebrew texts make sure to add the words "spirit" to such relation, lest the people learn Hebrew and somehow imply that the male believers are the male body of Christ, and the female believers the female body of Christ. That sort of heretical thinking would get one excommunicated just for daring to talk about, and any church in these latter days advocating for such things would be forced to confirm monogamy by the same society which openly pushes for a degenerate hook up culture devoid of love.
One might need to write such things in books and talk in coded parables like they were strangers in a strange land, and only a few would be able to grok what was being discussed.
sorting people into categories is at least 2000 years old but what is "new" (or rather secret knowledge, master morality, right hand path) is how to "unsort" these people into stable relations → team composition, organization theory, interpersonal compatibility
how to "unsort" these people into stable relations
my contribution is my pattern of human relations based on personal observation, and extrapolation via symmetry
looking for parallels in history, or looking for explanations of "why has nobody tried this" are a rabbithole on their own which quickly lead to analysis paralysis, trying to understand what cannot be understood
... and im afraid, the only way out is experiment