honojs
Just an idea : Replacing simple computational processes with WebAssembly
What is the feature you are proposing?
For simple computational processes such as "computing hash values", replacing them with WebAssembly may speed up the process.
https://github.com/honojs/hono/pull/1858/files#diff-85712e79b6fb34a25a128de109f2b36f0d63435bc39e521e9268d315e209f402R32-R39
The results of my benchmarks are as follows: "node" and "deno" have a large overhead at call time, but WebAssembly is still faster when the data size is large. "bun" has a small overhead, but WebAssembly is always faster.
https://gist.github.com/usualoma/760bf5fe5234ff1505767d36f3d85fce
Whether such a replacement should actually be made requires careful consideration, but it is good to keep in mind that such an option is available.
@usualoma
This is a very interesting idea, whether we use it or not "now"!
The results of my benchmarks are as follows: "node" and "deno" have a large overhead at call time, but WebAssembly is still faster when the data size is large. "bun" has a small overhead, but WebAssembly is always faster.
One more thing, I would like to measure the performance with Cloudflare Workers, but worked is probably for development, so the numbers may not be accurate. And, we can measure it in the actual production environment, but it would be more uncertain than local.
Either way, we'd like to consider it.
And "WASM Router" would also be interesting, although it may take longer to load in the initial stage.